The Writers' Greenhouse offers practical, creative writing courses for adults in Oxford, UK. It's run by Megan Kerr, a published writer and experienced teacher.
The courses launched in 2010, but started their life years before that. When I wanted to learn more about story building in a way that wasn't inhibiting or rule-bound, I started creating games and activities for my own writers' group to play, so we could try out new approaches. These grew into the original twelve-week Story Elements course. From there, I developed an on-going course (the follow-on course, which ran for five years) for students who wanted to continue getting input and feedback while they worked on longer-term writing projects. Through this, I gradually built up a selection of summer workshops, which I continue to expand in collaboration with my students. For a year, in 2014/15, I also taught through Oxfordshire County Council, where I ran the first Imaginary Worlds course. I then extended and developed this, and added it to The Writers' Greenhouse in February 2017.
Over the years, I've gradually recognised that not everyone wants to Become A Writer and hurl themselves into a novel-length masterpiece – in much the same way that I love drawing and painting, and going to art classes, but have no intention of staging an exhibition or remaking my career as An Artist. The courses, workshops, and my teaching style are inherently multi-level, so I was already catering to all levels of experience, but I also wanted to develop a course specifically to welcome beginners in, because so many people are taught that they're not "allowed" to write, or put off it by negative experiences at school or university. Over the summer in 2017, I began designing a course that would fling open all the doors in the sprawling mansion of creative writing, and in November 2017 I launched the Starting Points course. I'm now looking at adding weekday morning courses, for stay-at-home parents who find evenings difficult to arrange childcare, but who are free while the kids are at school.
I’ve ghostwritten seven novels and pseudonymously published a novel, novellas, and short stories. Under my own name, I've published fiction in Astrologica, the BFS Journal, New Writing, and Open, and poetry in the BFS Journal, Haiku Quarterly, and Sentinel. My magical-realist short story, "Rope of Words", won the 2012 BFS Short Story Competition. I've also contributed non-fiction and academic articles to Postmodern Culture, La Négation, and Filament. I recently completed a literary slipsteam novel, The Artist and the Mathematician, for which I received a Society of Authors grant, and am part-way through drafting another novel.
Before starting the writing courses, I taught English as a Foreign Language for five years, specialising in advanced and proficiency levels for Cambridge Exams and in materials creation. My courses & workshops draw on this grounding in teaching methodology and practice. I have a Masters in English Literature from the University of Oxford, UK (where I now live) and a First in English Literature from the University of Cape Town, South Africa, where I studied, among other things, poetry with Stephen Watson and fiction-writing with JM Coetzee.
The teaching style for all the courses and workshops is based around discussion, activities, and games. These are designed to introduce the various ideas and principles, and allow you to try everything out. For example, I might give you a discussion card with a few questions to talk through in small groups, a handout to lead you through a process of developing an idea, or a group-game with cards as prompts. (Most lessons involve a combination of all of these.) They also often use other hands-on activities, such as quick collages, drawing with felt-tips, coloured post-its for arranging events, and so on.
This style of teaching is often called "process learning" and has valuable benefits. First, it engages your understanding in a richer, more nuanced way. For example, I could just tell you the principle that we generally want a sympathetic main character. In any class, a few sensible people would object and come up with counter-examples - rightly so, because it's only a principle, not a rule. Slightly better, but still not great, I could just tell you the pros and cons of having a sympathetic character. That way I'm giving you more nuanced information, but that's all it is: informtion. It's much more productive if you explore the effects of a sympathetic or unsympathetic main character and come to your own more nuanced understanding. Because you're actively enaged in figuring it out yourself, it's much more memorable - plus we avoid any easy overgeneralisations. What's more, you've already processed the ideas in class: they're not academic notions, sitting outside your writing; they're already tools within your writing process.
This approach is also inherently multilevel. In any class, even if every student had the same amount of writing experience, everyone would have different strengths and gaps. For some, a sense of place is instinctive, while others struggle to write description. It's impossible for a teacher to tell information at the right level for everyone simultaneously. Some will be hearing what they already know, and switch off or feel irritated; others will be missing out on essential basics and feel lost or frustrated. Activity-led teaching means you can use and explore simultaneously: use what you already know, to deepen your understanding with more subtlety, and explore and discover what's new. All the materials are very carefully designed with this in mind, to lead you through a process of discovery while staying open-ended enough that different students can use them at different levels.
As well as these classroom benefits, this also means the process is much more natural: it's much more like what you'd actually do in your own writing. Everyone has different creative processes and we often need to change those up from time to time and from project to project. By emulating actual creative processes in class, we can explore and try out a wide range of different techniques. I keep the creative techniques as various as possible, so that you have a lovely wide repertoire to draw on in future.
The most immediately obvious benefit is obvious - and easy to underestimate: it's fun. Most of us have enough of a Protestant-work-ethic hangover that we're suspicious of fun, or at least think it can't be as good or useful as Hard Work. But fun is harder-working than we think, in several ways. First, imagine a group of people who love football and meet every weekend for a game. At the end of 90 minutes, they're all exhausted, sweaty, and grinning. They've also done a lot of exercise. Now, take the fun out. Analyse all the different exercises they did, the running, jumping, squatting, whatever. Instead of a game, just do 90 minutes of those exercises. With someone yelling and frowning at them. I can guarantee that they won't do as much, as fast - and they're much less likely to turn up next week. Fun doesn't mean the activity isn't worthwhile; it simply means we're enjoying it. Fun is a massive source of motivation, which is what gets you doing it again, which is how you get good at something. Second, having fun helps us learn better. Our brains prioritise things with "high emotional valence" - things that are emotionally intense. Fun is emotionally intense. So are pain, fear, and distress, of course, which is why we can bolt awake at 2am with the crystal-clear memory of that embarrassing thing we did 18 years ago, but not as good for learning, because your brain mostly says, very sensibly, "Nope, not going there again! Let's pretend that never happened." Fun also has other neurological benefits - it protects your brain from the effects of stress and it helps you build more connections. Thirdly, fun helps us try new things. All animals (and we're animals) are naturally neophobic, ie scared of new stuff, whether that's a new noise in the jungle or a new face at the window. Freaking out at something new is a survival mechanism. But if we want to learn new things, we have to become neophilic - ie love new stuff. That's where fun comes in. Because it's "just a game", because we're "just having a laugh", New Thing goes from scary to exciting. I've known about the teaching benefits of fun for years, but only recently, working with play expert and primatologist Isabel Behncke Izqueirdo, have I come to understand why it works so well.
So that's why, in the courses and workshops, I don't sit at the head of the table and tell you stuff. We have discussions, try out activities, play games, burst out laughing, scribble with felt-tips, play with post-its, and have fun. It works better that way. And it's more fun.
I won't share your email with anyone else. You'll get emails from me only, about upcoming courses, writing competitions, publishing opportunities, interesting articles about writing, new blog posts, and creative events in Oxford. All emails are sent via MailChimp and you can unsubscribe at any time. Add megan @ thewritersgreenhouse.co.uk to your address book if you want to keep the emails from vanishing into spam.